Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Shane Mullin
The Inner Workings of A Classic Nuclear Bomb |
To begin, WMDs, nuclear weapons in particular, were first being developed in the 1930s by the United States, who were collaborating with the United Kingdom and Canada in what was called 'The Manhattan Project'. This was the allied forces counter to the Nazi Germany Atomic Bomb Project who were rumoured to have begun developing these weapons to. The States knew that if the Germans were successful in creating the first atomic bomb then they would be able to end WWII.
Trinity Test |
On July 26, 1945 Japan was giving the ultimatum of surrendering or facing utter and absolute destruction. Japan did not surrender, and finally on August 6, 1945 the first bomb, named 'Little Boy' was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki three days later named 'Fat Man'. This bomb killed roughly one hundred thousand people and wounded tens of thousands more who would later die of the radiation. United States President Truman told Japan if they did not surrender now more would come and their military would be entirely crippled, and on August 15, 1945 Japan finally surrendered.
World War II Ending After Nukes Dropped On Hiroshima and Nagasaki |
The Americans heard of this occurrence, and the reaction was that of fear and confusion. How did the Soviets get the knowledge and means to develop such weapons? This caused the most technologically advanced country in terms of weaponry at the time to be afraid of something.
Headlines in an American Newspaper in Regards to This Threat |
Nuclear weapons were continuously developed and can now be launched from a range away. They can be dropped out of a plane. They can be shot from inside a submarine. And with the increase in knowledge of these weapons, more Countries began developing them. Currently, the United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, and Iran all have or have access to nuclear weapons.
COUNTRY | FIRST TEST | MOST RECENT TEST | TOTAL TESTS | ESTIMATED WARHEADS |
---|---|---|---|---|
United States | 1945 | 1992 | 1,054 | 7,650 |
Russia | 1949 | 1990 | 715 | 8,420 |
United Kingdom | 1952 | 1991 | 45 | 225 |
France | 1960 | 1996 | 210 | 300 |
China | 1964 | 1996 | 45 | 240 |
India | 1974 | 1998 | 6 | 80-100 |
Pakistan | 1998 | 1998 | 6 | 90-110 |
North Korea | 2006 | 2013 | 3 | Fewer than 10 |
Israel | No confirmed test | No confirmed test | No confirmed test | 80 |
Iran | No confirmed test | No confirmed test | No confirmed test | 0 |
Chart of Current Nuclear Threats (CNN)
So, now we have covered what has happened in the past with these devastating weapons, and what is currently occurring also. It is now time to look into the future to consider what could happen with these. Personally, I theorize that more, and more countries will gain access to these weapons. These weapons will become something of a normality. There is no secrecy to these weapons, and there will be even less in the future.
What The World Would Look Like Post Atomic War |
So, back to my hypothesis. More and more countries will have these weapons, and ultimately, it will be these weapons that could end all of humanity. It is these weapons, that struck fear into the hearts of the USA when the Soviets first develop their primitive nukes. These weapons are nothing but trouble, and personally I see them causing more issues than anything else in the world.
Albert Einstein said, "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." This quote, from arguably one of the world's smartest men is stating, that once World War III occurs, there will be no resources left to build anything. It will be back to the beginning of time, with few humans, no technology, and only sticks and stones to fight.
In summation, as technology progresses into the future as it always has, and always will do, the threat of a nuclear war will become more and more imminent. With this in mind, all it could take is one malfunctioning computer, that believes there is a missile in the air to spark a third world war. This would be the war to end all wars. The use of nuclear weapons would end the world as we all know it. It would flatten buildings, kill millions, and cause the sun to go into an ice age of sorts from the cloud of dust, debris, and smoke blocking out the sun. Nuclear weapons do our world no good. They are very much so an offensive weapon, and when a majority of the countries in the world has access to them, there is likely to be problems associated with this. These missiles will end up causing a catastrophic event, that could have been preventable, if other weapons were used, and this will be tragic.
Works Cited
History of Nuclear Weapons. Wikipedia, 16 May 2014. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/History_of_nuclear_weapons>.
"Japanese Surrenders." Second World War Japanese 'Holds Out'. Eccentric Parabola, n.d. Web. 15 June
2014. <http://eccentricparabola.blogspot.ca/2013/06/
mia-second-world-war-japanese-hold-outs.html>.
Nuclear Holocaust. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Nuclear_holocaust>.
Nuclear Weapons, Who Has What. CNN, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/
03/world/nuclear-weapon-states/>.
"Successful Soviet Atomic Test." Second Red Scare. Have We No Decency, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014.
<http://havewenodecency.weebly.com/second-red-scare.html>.
2014 Crimean Crisis. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
2014_Crimean_crisis>.
What Will Happen in Event of Nuclear War? What Will Happen in Event of Nuclear War? YouTube, n.d.
Web. 15 June 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epE1BGPMlrQ>.
World War III. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
World_War_III>.
wiki/History_of_nuclear_weapons>.
"Japanese Surrenders." Second World War Japanese 'Holds Out'. Eccentric Parabola, n.d. Web. 15 June
2014. <http://eccentricparabola.blogspot.ca/2013/06/
mia-second-world-war-japanese-hold-outs.html>.
Nuclear Holocaust. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Nuclear_holocaust>.
Nuclear Weapons, Who Has What. CNN, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2013/
03/world/nuclear-weapon-states/>.
"Successful Soviet Atomic Test." Second Red Scare. Have We No Decency, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014.
<http://havewenodecency.weebly.com/second-red-scare.html>.
2014 Crimean Crisis. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
2014_Crimean_crisis>.
What Will Happen in Event of Nuclear War? What Will Happen in Event of Nuclear War? YouTube, n.d.
Web. 15 June 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epE1BGPMlrQ>.
World War III. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 15 June 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
World_War_III>.
I completely agree with you that there is no secrecy to these weapons and that they will become more accessible as time goes on because while doing research for my blog post I came across an interview of a scientist saying something like "this is 1950s technology and we are living in 2011". But I don't understand where you were going with the whole 'hypothetical situation' thing. First of all, China, North Korea and Russia are all communist countries, so why would they team up on each other when there are such few communist countries left in the world. Wouldn't it make the most sense that they would all team up and go after other countries who are not communist? I personally don't believe that China and North Korea would ever team up to take over Russia. And if they did, Russia would use man power to defend from their attempted take over rather than go straight to the use of nukes. You said that Russia is a "very defensive country" yet you went on to say that they would instigate the fight and go straight to the use of nuclear weapons when China and North Korea were only using guns and man power. I highly doubt anybody wants to be the first person to use a nuclear weapon in the modern day after seeing the true power it beholds. Although I do agree with you that the United States would jump in to 'help', but again, I don't believe they would go straight to the use of nuclear weapons either... unless Russia was launching nukes. I agree with you that these weapons are nothing but bad for the world and that they could possibly end humanity as we know but I don't agree where you went with the 'hypothetical situation'. If you used countries that have different political beliefs who aren't really the best of buddies then I could see your point more clearly.
ReplyDeleteShane, you obviously did a lot of researches on your topic because it was explained very well. I completely agree with your point of view and what you said about about the WMD. The video you presented really helped me to understand more about the situation and it is really more dangerous I thought. In addition to that, your images and statistics were very effective in covering your point. I also like the quotes you have incorporated in your blog especially Einstein's: "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." This really explains how dangerous WMD are. Your post on this blog was a pleasure to read however, nuclear bombs are horrible and I hope we find a way to solve this problem.
ReplyDeleteSo you don't think MAD (mutually assured destruction) will work as it did during the cold war and the arms race? Why not?
ReplyDelete